Session Title

Robin Hood and the Outlaw Canon: Medieval Texts and Contexts

Sponsoring Organization(s)

International Association for Robin Hood Studies (IARHS)

Organizer Name

Lesley A. Coote, Alexander L. Kaufman

Organizer Affiliation

Univ. of Hull, Auburn Univ.-Montgomery

Presider Name

Alexander L. Kaufman

Paper Title 1

Why Outlaw Stories?

Presenter 1 Name

Lesley A. Coote

Paper Title 2

"Lighter than Robin Hood!": Canonical Chaucer and the Medieval Robin Hood Corpus in the Prologue to The Two Noble Kinsmen (1634)

Presenter 2 Name

Lorraine K. Stock

Presenter 2 Affiliation

Univ. of Houston

Paper Title 3

Materialism, Mimetics, and Monophony: Novelistic Discourse in the Sloane Life of Robin Hood

Presenter 3 Name

Dean A. Hoffman

Presenter 3 Affiliation

Univ. of North Carolina-Charlotte

Start Date

12-5-2013 8:30 AM

Session Location

Schneider 1130

Description

Robin Hood is certainly one of the best known figures associated with the Middle Ages. Like King Arthur and the characters and the iconography of the Arthurian tradition, Robin Hood and his topos have likewise become mainstays of popular culture and are in many ways part of the global consciousness. But popularity and name recognition does not always translate to canonicity. While the corpus of Arthurian literature contains a number of texts that are firmly within the literary canon (Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, Sir Thomas Malory’s Morte Darthur, and Chretien’s five romances, to name but a few), the same cannot be said of the texts of the Robin Hood tradition. The aim of these sessions is to address the literary, cultural, and ideological factors that have kept the Robin Hood tradition out of the literary canon, and to examine ways in which certain Robin Hood texts have begun to work their way back into the scholarly and pedagogical discourse. These sessions are unique, for the question of the canonicity of the Robin Hood tradition as not been adequately addressed. Moreover, these session will be timely, for the fifteen years has seen not only an increase in significant scholarly contributions to the field of Robin Hood studies, such as Stephen Knight and Thomas H. Ohlgren’s TEAMS edition Robin Hood and Other Outlaw Tales (1997), Knight’s Robin Hood: A Mythic Biography (2003), and Ohlgren’s Robin Hood: The Early Poems, 1465-1560 (2007), but also has witnessed a growth in the number of Robin Hood classes taught at undergraduate and graduate levels and even in some high schools. A transgressive figure, Robin Hood and his texts have been given outsider status, yet he and his greenwood world have maintained a hold on our collective imagination. It seems that now is the opportune time for a reconsideration of Robin Hood’s place within the canon.

Alexander L. Kaufman

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
May 12th, 8:30 AM

Robin Hood and the Outlaw Canon: Medieval Texts and Contexts

Schneider 1130

Robin Hood is certainly one of the best known figures associated with the Middle Ages. Like King Arthur and the characters and the iconography of the Arthurian tradition, Robin Hood and his topos have likewise become mainstays of popular culture and are in many ways part of the global consciousness. But popularity and name recognition does not always translate to canonicity. While the corpus of Arthurian literature contains a number of texts that are firmly within the literary canon (Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, Sir Thomas Malory’s Morte Darthur, and Chretien’s five romances, to name but a few), the same cannot be said of the texts of the Robin Hood tradition. The aim of these sessions is to address the literary, cultural, and ideological factors that have kept the Robin Hood tradition out of the literary canon, and to examine ways in which certain Robin Hood texts have begun to work their way back into the scholarly and pedagogical discourse. These sessions are unique, for the question of the canonicity of the Robin Hood tradition as not been adequately addressed. Moreover, these session will be timely, for the fifteen years has seen not only an increase in significant scholarly contributions to the field of Robin Hood studies, such as Stephen Knight and Thomas H. Ohlgren’s TEAMS edition Robin Hood and Other Outlaw Tales (1997), Knight’s Robin Hood: A Mythic Biography (2003), and Ohlgren’s Robin Hood: The Early Poems, 1465-1560 (2007), but also has witnessed a growth in the number of Robin Hood classes taught at undergraduate and graduate levels and even in some high schools. A transgressive figure, Robin Hood and his texts have been given outsider status, yet he and his greenwood world have maintained a hold on our collective imagination. It seems that now is the opportune time for a reconsideration of Robin Hood’s place within the canon.

Alexander L. Kaufman