Naming Medieval Sexualities (A Panel Discussion)
Sponsoring Organization(s)
Society for the Study of Homosexuality in the Middle Ages (SSHMA)
Organizer Name
Graham N. Drake
Organizer Affiliation
SUNY-Geneseo
Presider Name
Jennifer N. Brown
Presider Affiliation
Marymount Manhattan College
Paper Title 1
Panelist
Presenter 1 Name
Susannah Mary Chewning
Presenter 1 Affiliation
Union County College
Paper Title 2
Panelist
Presenter 2 Name
Ellen Friedrich
Presenter 2 Affiliation
Valdosta State Univ.
Paper Title 3
Panelist
Presenter 3 Name
Wan-Chuan Kao
Presenter 3 Affiliation
Washington and Lee Univ.
Paper Title 4
Panelist
Presenter 4 Name
Felipe Esteban Rojas
Presenter 4 Affiliation
Univ. of Chicago
Paper Title 5
Panelist
Presenter 5 Name
Lisa Weston
Presenter 5 Affiliation
California State Univ.-Fresno
Start Date
8-5-2014 10:00 AM
Session Location
Valley I Hadley 102
Description
The 2013 panel discussion, “Are We Post-Queer Yet?” sponsored by The Society for the Study of Homosexuality in the Middle Ages, raised multiple questions on nomenclature and labels: what happens when we name, categorize, or segregate expressions of sexuality in medieval texts? The work of scholars such as Karma Lochrie on the sexuality of the medieval Amazon, for example, or of Heloise and Abelard, demonstrates the difficulty of negotiating between “standard” categories in modern sexology and the descriptions and assumptions of medieval scientists or theologians. This panel discussion invites scholars working in fields ranging from literature to history to theology to investigate both the utility and the pitfalls of naming and classifying sexual experience, particularly same-sex and queer relationships, in the Middle Ages.
Graham N. Drake
Naming Medieval Sexualities (A Panel Discussion)
Valley I Hadley 102
The 2013 panel discussion, “Are We Post-Queer Yet?” sponsored by The Society for the Study of Homosexuality in the Middle Ages, raised multiple questions on nomenclature and labels: what happens when we name, categorize, or segregate expressions of sexuality in medieval texts? The work of scholars such as Karma Lochrie on the sexuality of the medieval Amazon, for example, or of Heloise and Abelard, demonstrates the difficulty of negotiating between “standard” categories in modern sexology and the descriptions and assumptions of medieval scientists or theologians. This panel discussion invites scholars working in fields ranging from literature to history to theology to investigate both the utility and the pitfalls of naming and classifying sexual experience, particularly same-sex and queer relationships, in the Middle Ages.
Graham N. Drake