Exploring the Manuscripts and Textual Traditions of Geoffrey Chaucer
Sponsoring Organization(s)
Canterbury Tales Project
Organizer Name
Peter Robinson
Organizer Affiliation
Univ. of Saskatchewan
Presider Name
D. Thomas Hanks, Jr.
Presider Affiliation
Baylor Univ.
Paper Title 1
Transcription and Variance in the Reeve's Tale
Presenter 1 Name
Thomas J. Farrell
Presenter 1 Affiliation
Stetson Univ.
Paper Title 2
Delivering the Canterbury Tales: The Reception of the CantApp
Presenter 2 Name
Barbara Bordalejo
Presenter 2 Affiliation
KU Leuven
Paper Title 3
Towards an Edition of Troilus and Criseyde
Presenter 3 Name
Adam Vazquez Cruz
Presenter 3 Affiliation
Univ. of Saskatchewan
Start Date
15-5-2016 8:30 AM
Session Location
Schneider 1130
Description
Among questions this session might address are:
1. How should we approach the manuscripts? Should we prioritize the manuscript itself (its history, its construction, its material aspect) over the text it contains, or the reverse?
2. To what extent have recent discoveries concerning Chaucer and his scribes altered the way we research, edit and read Chaucerian texts?
3. How do digital methods alter the terrain of editing and reading?
4. Can we crowd-source editions? Is the concept of a ‘crowd-sourced edition’ a nonsense?
We welcome also reports from editorial projects addressing Chaucerian texts.One of the most healthy aspects of recent work on Chaucerian manuscripts is the diversity of opinion about methodologies and possibilities. We would like this session to reflect this diversity.
Peter Robinson
Exploring the Manuscripts and Textual Traditions of Geoffrey Chaucer
Schneider 1130
Among questions this session might address are:
1. How should we approach the manuscripts? Should we prioritize the manuscript itself (its history, its construction, its material aspect) over the text it contains, or the reverse?
2. To what extent have recent discoveries concerning Chaucer and his scribes altered the way we research, edit and read Chaucerian texts?
3. How do digital methods alter the terrain of editing and reading?
4. Can we crowd-source editions? Is the concept of a ‘crowd-sourced edition’ a nonsense?
We welcome also reports from editorial projects addressing Chaucerian texts.One of the most healthy aspects of recent work on Chaucerian manuscripts is the diversity of opinion about methodologies and possibilities. We would like this session to reflect this diversity.
Peter Robinson