Know(en), Biknow(en), Knowelich(en): Piers Plowman and the Poetics of Epistemology
Sponsoring Organization(s)
International Piers Plowman Society
Organizer Name
Tekla Bude
Organizer Affiliation
Oregon State Univ.
Presider Name
Tekla Bude
Paper Title 1
Infinity and the Infinite: Temporality and the Measure of Faith in Piers Plowman
Presenter 1 Name
Stephanie L. Batkie
Presenter 1 Affiliation
Sewanee: The Univ. of the South
Paper Title 2
Piers Plowman and the End of Knowing
Presenter 2 Name
Jennifer Sisk
Presenter 2 Affiliation
Univ. of Vermont
Paper Title 3
Lifetimes of Learning in Piers Plowman
Presenter 3 Name
Alastair Bennett
Presenter 3 Affiliation
Royal Holloway, Univ. of London
Start Date
13-5-2017 1:30 PM
Session Location
Bernhard Brown & Gold Room
Description
When Dame Scripture derides Will in the opening lines of Passus B.XI, she calls attention to his lack of knowledge: multi multa sciunt, et seipsos nesciunt (many know things yet do not know themselves), she says.
Scripture’s aphorism is at the heart of this session, which invites proposals for papers reflecting on the role of knowledge in Piers Plowman. What does it mean to have, construct, or to create the conditions necessary for knowing within the poem? What are the limits of formal, poetic, historical, or allegorical knowledge? How do evidence, testimony, reflection, perception, introspection, or faculty psychology inflect the work of the poem, and how does Piers Plowman in turn understand each of these categories? How do wordplay, alliteration, or poetics create knowledge? How does propositional knowledge relate to self-knowledge and acknowledgement?
Tekla Bude
Know(en), Biknow(en), Knowelich(en): Piers Plowman and the Poetics of Epistemology
Bernhard Brown & Gold Room
When Dame Scripture derides Will in the opening lines of Passus B.XI, she calls attention to his lack of knowledge: multi multa sciunt, et seipsos nesciunt (many know things yet do not know themselves), she says.
Scripture’s aphorism is at the heart of this session, which invites proposals for papers reflecting on the role of knowledge in Piers Plowman. What does it mean to have, construct, or to create the conditions necessary for knowing within the poem? What are the limits of formal, poetic, historical, or allegorical knowledge? How do evidence, testimony, reflection, perception, introspection, or faculty psychology inflect the work of the poem, and how does Piers Plowman in turn understand each of these categories? How do wordplay, alliteration, or poetics create knowledge? How does propositional knowledge relate to self-knowledge and acknowledgement?
Tekla Bude