<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Reading Horizons</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 Western Michigan University All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons</link>
<description>Recent documents in Reading Horizons</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:21:07 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>








<item>
<title>Reading Horizons, vol. 52, no. 2</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss2/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss2/7</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:39:32 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Complete issue of <em>Reading Horizons, </em>volume 52, issue 2.</p>

	]]>
</description>


</item>






<item>
<title>An Investigation of the Efficacy of One Urban Literacy Academy: Enhancing Teacher Capacity Through Professional Development</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss2/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss2/6</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:39:31 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In order to systemically improve student achievement in elementary literacy, a large urban school district partnered with a local university to develop a model for high-quality professional development that hopefully would result in long-term changes in teachers’ literacy instructional/practices. Schools were selected based on their Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in reading/language arts’ status. The resulting literacy academy provided approximately 150 hours of professional development over time through two semesters of graduate level course work; 60 hours of it job-embedded. The Literacy Academy was based on a capacity-building model to build teacher knowledge and expertise in reading instruction, specifically in the areas of classroom assessment and use of student data to inform instruction; effective teaching methods in such areas as phonics, phonemic awareness, comprehension, fluency, vocabulary development, and writing; adapting instruction for students having special needs; and family involvement techniques. Weekly literacy coaching supported the translation of the new learning into practice. A mixed method design was used in this study and the results of this work are presented.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>J. Helen Perkins et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Improving Oral Reading Fluency through Readers Theatre</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss2/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss2/5</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:39:29 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In order for students to learn how to construct meaning from text, teachers must apply instructional strategies that will help readers transition from simple decoding of words to fluent word identification. This article will provide an overview of the literature related to the role of fluency in reading; explain research-based recommendations for fostering fluency with struggling readers; discuss the use of repeated readings, in particular Readers Theatre, as an instructional strategy for developing fluency; and present the findings of a study in which a third-grade teacher applied Readers Theatre to improve the fluency levels of her struggling readers.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Maryann Mraz et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Looking Ahead With Hope: Reviving the Reading Maturity Construct as Social Science for Adolescent and Adult Readers</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss2/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss2/4</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:39:28 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>“Reading maturity” is a construct that looks broadly at reading development encompassing not only basic reading skills but reading habits, attitudes, and dispositions. It has a rich history and this article calls for a need to make reading maturity a necessary part of the literacy curriculum. It offers a working description and reviews past history of the construct, discusses why reading maturity is important, and provides ideas about monitoring progress toward reading maturity. This article asserts that the reading field has developed a solid understanding of how students acquire basic reading skill and content area literacy abilities. However, a compelling and unified larger purpose for reading education seems absent, particularly for adolescent and adult readers. This article suggests that renewed attention to reading maturity could help address this. It contends that attention to reading maturity should involve more than general notions of becoming “well-read.” Instead, it should include a balanced social-science approach to intentionally and systematically monitoring student progress toward reading maturity. Suggestions are offered to help begin this process including free online access to a reading maturity assessment and planning instrument called <em>The Reading Maturity Survey</em> (Thomas, 2001).</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Matt Thomas</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>What Fifth-Grade Students Reveal About Their Literacies by Writing and Telling Narratives</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss2/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss2/3</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:39:27 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Written and oral literacy narratives produced by seven fifth-grade students are examined to identify the literacy identities students construct when narrating their past and present experiences with reading and writing. The narrative analyses reveal four major findings: 1. The students who contributed to this study have experienced literacy in multiple modes and contexts indicative of relatively broad conceptions of what counts as literacy. 2. They primarily describe literacy experiences in positive or neutral terms; when literacy events are evaluated negatively, it is usually in response to literacy demands that diminished students’ feelings of autonomy. 3. Students in this study intuitively understand that literacy is a set of social practices that take place in interactions among multiple actors. 4. Students sometimes portray themselves as having power to control the direction of literacy events; other times, their agency is limited by authoritative actors who are portrayed as enforcers of reading rules rather than as collaborative supporters. These findings are relevant for instructional practice because they present personal narrative writing as a way of infusing student voices into the discourse of the classroom in hopes of creating a more culturally relevant instructional space.</p>
<p><em>At Granny’s table, spread thick with food, this is where your story begins. You are sitting with an open spiral notebook in front of you, a pencil curled tightly in your fingers. Uncle Joe took you to the store that day in the back of his truck. Your brothers asked for candy bars and sodas; and so did you, at first. But then you saw the stack of notebooks, sitting on the shelf two aisles over beneath rows of Funyuns and hot fries and barbecue pork rinds. You held your breath. There was a reason for those notebooks. They were covered with a thin layer of dust, into which you instinctively inscribed your name with your index finger. Then you blew and watched your name soak into the air around you. And you knew that all the Zero bars and Gatorades in the world would not satisfy you the way that notebook would. So you marched up to the counter and watched Joe’s expression as he paid seventy-five cents for the raggedy orange spiral notebook that would change your life forever.</em></p>
<p><em>So you are sitting with the spiral notebook in front of you. While everyone else around you eats, you stare at the dingy white pages, then at the point of your pencil which you found under Granny’s bed and sharpened with a kitchen knife. If you don’t eat now, don’t complain later about being hungry, Ma tells you. You hear her, but you continue to be mesmerized by the blankness of the paper in front of you.</em></p>
<p>The preceding excerpt is from an autobiographical piece I wrote several years ago to share with my fifth-grade students. I included this here as a reminder of Soliday’s (1994) assertion that life stories are “dialogical account[s] of one’s experience rather than a chronological report of verifiable events” (p. 514). In narrativizing this event from my childhood, I went to great lengths to position myself as a certain kind of person (i.e., an eager writer). This narrative is not a verbatim reconstruction of the past. Yes, I enjoyed writing as a kid; and yes, my uncle once bought me a notebook; but the magnitude of the event is obviously overstated. My narrativized version of this event is a carefully plotted construction of how my adult self wants my child self to be portrayed.</p>
<p>In the analysis that follows, student literacy narratives will be treated as storied retellings in which students seek to construct a particular reading/writing identity (Connelly & Clandinin, 1990). These narratives speak volumes about the way students position themselves in the context of school and out-of-school literacy events.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Dennis S. Davis</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>At-Risk Preschool Children: Establishing Developmental Ranges that Suggest At-Promise</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss2/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss2/2</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:39:24 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The Early Reading First (ERF) program provided grants to transform preschools into centers of education excellence with the ultimate goal of preventing later reading difficulties (No Child Left Behind Act of 2001). The intent of ERF grants was to provide preschoolers with the necessary cognitive, early language, and literacy skills for success in kindergarten (United States Department of Education, 2007). Programs that received ERF funds were required to monitor children’s progress in specific literacy and language skills (i.e., automatic recognition of alphabet letters, knowledge of the conventions of print, understanding of phonemes and letters, and use of increasingly complex vocabulary) and to identify children who may be “at risk”. However, ERF failed to provide guidelines for monitoring progress or definitions of at risk. In this article, we explore an alternative approach to identifying children as at risk in preschool using data from the third year of Project EXEL, a 2002 ERF project. Our study developed a set of benchmarks for end-of-year preschool accomplishments in the areas of alphabet recognition, concepts about print, phonemic awareness and alphabetic principle, and vocabulary development. We also explored how these benchmarks might be used with monitoring assessments to identify preschoolers who may not be making satisfactory progress toward expected end-of-the-year performance.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Lea M. McGee et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>In Memoriam To Dorothy J. McGinnis</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss2/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss2/1</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:39:23 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>A letter from the Editor--Dorothy J. McGinnis passing.</p>

	]]>
</description>


</item>






<item>
<title>Reading Horizons, vol. 52, no. 1</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss1/8</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss1/8</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:39:16 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Complete issue of <em>Reading Horizons</em> volume 52, issue 1.</p>

	]]>
</description>


</item>






<item>
<title>Author Index</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss1/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss1/7</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:39:14 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Index to authors in volume 52.</p>

	]]>
</description>


</item>






<item>
<title>Article Index</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss1/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss1/6</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:39:11 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Index to articles in volume 52.</p>

	]]>
</description>


</item>






<item>
<title>New Authors, New Books, and New Horizons</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss1/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss1/5</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:39:09 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Enersen, Adele. (2012). When my baby dreams. New York: HarperCollins/Balzer + Bray. 48 pages, $14.99, ISBN: 978-0-062-07175-0.</p>
<p>Lewis, Caron. (2012). Stuck with the blooz. Illus. by Jon Davis. New York: Harcourt Children’s Books. 40 pages, $16.99, ISBN: 978-0-547-74560-2.</p>
<p>Ashley-Hollinger, Mika. (2012). Precious Bones. New York: Delacorte. 344 pages, $16.99, ISBN: 978-0-385-74219-1.</p>
<p>Dias Lorenzi, Natalie. (2012). Flying the dragon. Illus. by Kelly Murphy. Watertown, MA: Charlesbridge. 240 pages, $16.95, ISBN: 978-1-580-89434-0.</p>
<p>Krumwiede, Lana. (2012). Freakling. Watertown, MA: Candlewick Press, 320 pages, $15.99, ISBN: 978-0-763-65937-0.</p>
<p>Palacio, R.J. (2012). Wonder. New York: Random House, 313 pages, $15.99, ISBN: 978-0-3758-6902-0.</p>
<p>Andrews, Jesse. (2012). Me and Earl and the dying girl. New York: Harry N. Abrams. 304 pages, $16.95, ISBN: 978-1419701764.</p>
<p>Clayton, Colleen. (2012). What happens next. New York: Little Brown/Poppy. 310 pages, $17.99, ISBN: 978-0-316-19868-4.</p>
<p>Dunn, Patricia. (2012). Rebels by accident. New York: Alikai Press. 225 pages, $12.95, ISBN: 978-0-9854921-2-0.</p>
<p>Howard, A.G. (2012). Splintered. New York: Amulet/Abrams, 377 pages, $16.95, ISBN: 978-14197-0428-4.</p>
<p>Morel, Alex. (2012). Survive. New York: Penguin/Razorbill. 259 pages, $17.99, ISBN: 978-1-595-14510-9.</p>
<p>Patterson, Janci. (2012). Chasing the skip. New York: Henry Holt, 228 pages, $16.99, ISBN: 978-0-8050-9391-9.</p>
<p>Walker, Brian F. (2012). Black boy white school. New York: HarperTeen. 256 pages, $17.99, ISBN: 978-0-061-91483-6.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Barbara A. Ward et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Exploring Bilingual Books with Five Chinese First Graders: Children’s Responses and Biliteracy Development</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss1/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss1/4</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:39:07 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This qualitative case study examines how five Chinese first graders responded to bilingual English/Chinese picture books and how bilingual books used during an eight-week study session impacted their bilingual and biliteracy development. Reader response and socio-cultural theories were the theoretical perspectives that underpin this study. Four bilingual picture books were selected for the five participating Chinese children to read during an eight-week period. The researchers specifically sought answers to two questions: (1) How do Chinese children respond to the bilingual books? (2) What impact do the bilingual book study sessions have on children’s bilingual and biliteracy development? The findings suggested these children responded positively by becoming engaged, making connections, activating cultural and background knowledge, and showing unnoticed talent. In addition, bilingual books, combined with appropriate instruction, can be a powerful resource to promote bilingual and biliteracy development.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Ran Hu et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>The Metalinguistic Protocol: Making Disciplinary Literacies Visible in Secondary Teaching and Learning</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss1/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss1/3</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:39:04 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Concerns about adolescent literacy continue to be highlighted in regards to the challenges of reading and learning from academic text. Recent efforts to address these concerns have led to an examination of the disciplines and their specialized ways of thinking and using language. In this article I discusses a metalinguistic protocol in a think-aloud process as a framework to use in university content area literacy courses with secondary preservice teachers to examine the language and thinking as it is used in the disciplines of knowledge and to address the implications of disciplinary literacies for teaching and learning in secondary schooling.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Kerry G. McArthur</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Addressing Reading Underachievement in African American Boys through a Multi-Contextual Approach</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss1/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss1/2</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:39:01 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Much has been written about reading disparities between African American males and other student groups. Interestingly, the majority of this scholarship focuses on African American males at pre-adolescent states of development and beyond. To date, relatively little has been documented relative to improving reading outcomes in African American males in early childhood and elementary contexts. The purpose of this article is to present a multi-contextual framework for improving reading outcomes in African American boys in P-5 contexts specifically. I conclude with a discussion of three important commitments that teachers and administrators must be willing to embrace in order for these strategies to produce successful results.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Terry Husband</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Letter From the Editor</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss1/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss1/1</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:38:58 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>A letter from the editor,</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Karen F. Thomas</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Reading Horizons vol. 51, no. 4</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol51/iss4/9</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol51/iss4/9</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:20:22 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Complete issue of <em>Reading Horizons</em> volume 51, issue 4.</p>

	]]>
</description>


</item>






<item>
<title>Author Index</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol51/iss4/8</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol51/iss4/8</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:20:20 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Index to authors in volume 51</p>

	]]>
</description>


</item>






<item>
<title>Article Index</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol51/iss4/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol51/iss4/7</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:20:19 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Index to articles in volume 51.</p>

	]]>
</description>


</item>






<item>
<title>From the Editor</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol51/iss4/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol51/iss4/6</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:20:18 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>A letter from the editor.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Karen F. Thomas</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Great Books for Late Summer Reading</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol51/iss4/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol51/iss4/4</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 13:05:33 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>For decades now, reading experts have expressed concern that the competence gained by struggling readers during the academic year is lost during the summer months. While academic enrichment and remediation programs can reduce that loss, one of the best practices to build better readers is by having them read during breaks from school. At least one study clearly supports this suggestion. In his study of 1,600 elementary students in the mid-Atlantic area, researcher James Kim (2009) found that regardless of previous achievement level or race or socioeconomic level, children who read more books performed better on reading comprehension tests in the fall than their peers who had read one or no books over the summer. As one result of this study, Kim and White (2008) and White and Kim (2008) offer helpful ways to keep youngsters reading during the summer. While some districts create a required summer list, others design incentive programs. Still others actually mail a packet of books to their students. Perhaps small book clubs initiated to stem the tide of the summer slump in reading could combine reading engaging trade books with young readers’ social nature. Whatever you decide to do, don’t let this be The Summer of No Reading. Hasten to a library or bookstore and pick out a book that will foster the love of reading in your household or community. Below we share some of our favorite books for summer.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Terrell A. Young et al.</author>


</item>





</channel>
</rss>
