Irrationality as a Fruitful Methodology (A Roundtable)
Sponsoring Organization(s)
Heroic Age: A Journal of Early Medieval Northwestern Europe
Organizer Name
Deanna Forsman
Organizer Affiliation
North Hennepin Community College
Presider Name
William Schipper
Presider Affiliation
Memorial Univ. of Newfoundland
Paper Title 1
Panelist
Presenter 1 Name
Deanna Forsman
Paper Title 2
Panelist
Presenter 2 Name
Jennifer Jordan
Presenter 2 Affiliation
Stony Brook Univ.
Paper Title 3
Panelist
Presenter 3 Name
Richard Scott Nokes
Presenter 3 Affiliation
Troy Univ.
Paper Title 4
Panelist
Presenter 4 Name
Larry Swain
Presenter 4 Affiliation
Bemidji State Univ.
Paper Title 5
Panelist
Presenter 5 Name
Silas Mallery
Presenter 5 Affiliation
North Hennepin Community College
Start Date
11-5-2014 8:30 AM
Session Location
Schneider 1220
Description
As scholars of the Middle Ages, we attempt to understand and explain human behavior in the past. Often, we favor explanations that stem from reason, even though modern social science demonstrates that while groups have relatively predictable behavior, that of an individual need not be so. The purpose of this roundtable is to spark a discussion around the idea of the irrationality of human behavior, and to explore the possibility of using irrationality as a fruitful methodology of inquiry and explanation. Can we have meaningful discussions about the past if we assume that not all thought processes, decisions, and behaviors were rational?
Deanna D. Forsman
Irrationality as a Fruitful Methodology (A Roundtable)
Schneider 1220
As scholars of the Middle Ages, we attempt to understand and explain human behavior in the past. Often, we favor explanations that stem from reason, even though modern social science demonstrates that while groups have relatively predictable behavior, that of an individual need not be so. The purpose of this roundtable is to spark a discussion around the idea of the irrationality of human behavior, and to explore the possibility of using irrationality as a fruitful methodology of inquiry and explanation. Can we have meaningful discussions about the past if we assume that not all thought processes, decisions, and behaviors were rational?
Deanna D. Forsman