Date of Defense

6-12-2025

Date of Graduation

8-2025

Department

Aviation

First Advisor

Dominic Nicolai

Second Advisor

Robert Bunday

Third Advisor

Jason Blair

Abstract

The following content delves into the current issues surrounding the FAA’s designated pilot examiner (DPE) system, which, while functional, is increasingly strained by growing demand and outdated policies. Through firsthand experience, survey data, and analysis of current practices, the paper emphasizes some of the most pressing problems, including scheduling inefficiencies, inconsistent examiner expectations, manual eligibility checks despite the widespread use of digital logbooks, and a lack of meaningful oversight or feedback mechanisms for both DPEs and CFIs.

A major focus is the outdated scheduling process, which remains largely decentralized and prone to double-booking, cancellations, and long wait times, especially for students in high-density areas. Proposed solutions include a FAA-backed scheduling platform and more formal protection of check ride slots, which would reduce the likelihood of last-minute cancellations that waste everyone’s time and money. Also, examining the lack of clarity and protection surrounding DPE appointments, emphasizing the importance of transparency and due process, possibly through the establishment of a peer review board.

Another core issue discussed is the FAA’s ongoing reliance on manual logbook checks, even though 94% of pilots surveyed reported using digital logbooks. Changes such as integrating eligibility indicators into the 8710 form and allowing digitally verified certificates of eligibility can streamline the check ride process and reduce examiner workload. Concerns regarding differing 141 school minimum requirements are acknowledged, but solutions are proposed that would still protect the integrity of the process while embracing technology.

Also exploring the controversial topic of self-examination authority, which recognizes its role in alleviating examiner bottlenecks but warns against widespread adoption due to risks of lowered standards and diminished oversight. A balanced approach is proposed, wherein self-examining schools still require at least one check ride with a DPE, ensuring that external accountability is upheld.

Finally, suggesting the development of a feedback loop from DPEs to CFIs to identify and address trends in training deficiencies. This would not serve as a punitive measure but rather as a tool to enhance training quality and improve pass rates over time.

Ultimately, arguing that the current DPE system is not broken, but rather showing signs of strain. Reasonable and practical changes can be made to modernize the process, relieve pressure on examiners, and better serve students, all without compromising safety or standards.

Access Setting

Honors Thesis-Open Access

Download

Included in

Aviation Commons

Share

COinS