Date of Defense
Spring 4-22-1994
Department
Speech Pathology and Audiology
First Advisor
Nickola Nelson, Speech Pathology/Audiology
Second Advisor
Christine Bahr, Special Education
Third Advisor
Laura Getty, Kalamazoo Valley Intermediate School District
Abstract
This was a study of oral and written communication of adolescents with autism. The investigator held 12 to 14 individual social conversations (half orally and half written) with three adolescents with autism (2 males, 1 female) in 15 to 20 minute session in the students' own classrooms over a 15 week period. Oral sessions were alternated with written sessions (passing paper and pen back and forth). Each session was tape-recorded, transcribed, coded for (a) mean length of utterance, (b) communicative functions, (c) turn-taking, and (d) topic matching. Transcriptions were coded and analyzed using the computer software, Systematic Analysis of Language Transcription. Features of the conversations were then compared within and across subjects for modality effects (written vs. oral). Results showed a range of individual discourse styles across subjects, with one subject in particular showing more elaborate responses in the written modality. If written capabilities exceed oral performance, written communication may provide supplemental or alternative methods of teaching students with autism in the classroom or may enhance social communication in multiple settings.
Recommended Citation
Schairer, Kim S., "Written vs. Oral Communication in Adolescents with Autism" (1994). Honors Theses. 548.
https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/honors_theses/548
Access Setting
Honors Thesis-Campus Only