As a legally mandated grievance mechanism, welfare fair hearings provide a formal recourse for applicants and recipients of welfare dissatisfied with agency decisions. Fair hearings may be viewed as an example of one agency's attempt to foster fairness and to control administrative discretion. However, as a mechanism for redressing grievances, welfare fair hearings have a number of severe limitations. Social workers practicing with potential and actual recipients of public welfare are in a position to reduce these limitations through client advocacy.
Hagen, Jan L.
"Welfare Fair Hearings and Client Advocacy: A Role for Social Workers,"
The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare: Vol. 13:
2, Article 11.
Available at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol13/iss2/11
You may need to log in to your campus proxy before being granted access to the full-text above.