ScholarWorks > HHS > Social Work > JSSW > Vol. 41 > Iss. 4 (2014)
Keywords
Debt, alternative financial services, AFS, secondary financial services, secondary labor market
Abstract
Stagnant income and persistent debt have induced low- and middle-income households to rely on alternative financial services (AFS): buy-here-pay-here auto loans, check-cashers, payday loans, auto title loans, rent-to-own furniture and appliances, and pawnshops. A secondary financial services market has evolved to serve the secondary labor market, replete with trade associations as well as state and federal regulators. Mainstream financial institutions have marketed innovations, such as reloadable debit cards, to appeal to low- and middle-income consumers. High fees and interest rates of AFS products have fueled a volatile debate about the future of the secondary financial services market, with options including prohibition, regulation, and inclusion.
Recommended Citation
Stoesz, David
(2014)
"Are Payday Loans Really Evil? Controversy, Regulation, and Innovation in the Secondary Financial Services Market,"
The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare: Vol. 41:
Iss.
4, Article 2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15453/0191-5096.3979
Available at:
https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol41/iss4/2
Off-campus users:
You may need to log in to your campus proxy before being granted access to the full-text above.