Author

Swearingen

Date of Award

8-1983

Degree Name

Master of Arts

Department

Psychology

First Advisor

Dr. Dale Brethower

Second Advisor

Dr. Norman Peterson

Third Advisor

Dr. Jack Michael

Access Setting

Masters Thesis-Open Access

Abstract

This research examined two methods of administering the Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ), a commercially available job analysis tool. The currently accepted method of administering the PAQ involves reading the job description, touring the work-site and then completing the PAQ with the incumbent. The second method used only the job description for the analysis data base. The comparison was made using three different measures, selection of GATB tests, "Selected PAQ Items" and PAQ aptitude attribute ratings. The two different methods selected the same GATB tests an average of 83% of the time and selected the same attributes 96% of the time. Inter-analyst reliability was higher for the experimental method (0.74 versus 0.66). These results indicate that it may be appropriate to use the job description for conducting a PAQ analysis rather than the more costly method of interviewing an incumbent.

Share

COinS