"Take Anothir Forme": The Selection of Forms in Thomas Hoccleve's Work
Sponsoring Organization(s)
International Hoccleve Society
Organizer Name
David Watt
Organizer Affiliation
Univ. of Manitoba
Presider Name
David Watt
Paper Title 1
Hoccleve and the Form of the Prologue
Presenter 1 Name
A. C. Spearing
Presenter 1 Affiliation
Univ. of Virginia
Paper Title 2
Hoccleve's Poetics of Heresy and Sovereignty in the Regiment of Princes
Presenter 2 Name
Robin Wharton
Presenter 2 Affiliation
Georgia Institute of Technology
Paper Title 3
"The Substaunce of My Memorie": Memorial Forms in Thomas Hoccleve's "My Compleinte" and "La Male Regle"
Presenter 3 Name
Amy Anderson
Presenter 3 Affiliation
Univ. of Kentucky
Paper Title 4
Hoccleve's Formulary: Parchment Poetics, Literary Allusions
Presenter 4 Name
Helen Maree Hickey
Presenter 4 Affiliation
Univ. of Melbourne
Start Date
9-5-2013 3:30 PM
Session Location
Schneider 1345
Description
This session will explore how recent critical interest in form and formalism might contribute to our understanding of Hoccleve’s work as a maker of poetry and books. It will also explore how Hoccleve’s making of poetry and of books might contribute to our understanding of form in the early fifteenth century. Hoccleve’s own diction suggests that the selection of forms in the bureaucratic and moral realms can determine the difference between “harm and deceit” and “reward and truth.” To what extent do these consequences apply to the selection of literary and physical forms in Hoccleve’s work and, more broadly, to our conception of form in the early fifteenth century?
David A. Watt
"Take Anothir Forme": The Selection of Forms in Thomas Hoccleve's Work
Schneider 1345
This session will explore how recent critical interest in form and formalism might contribute to our understanding of Hoccleve’s work as a maker of poetry and books. It will also explore how Hoccleve’s making of poetry and of books might contribute to our understanding of form in the early fifteenth century. Hoccleve’s own diction suggests that the selection of forms in the bureaucratic and moral realms can determine the difference between “harm and deceit” and “reward and truth.” To what extent do these consequences apply to the selection of literary and physical forms in Hoccleve’s work and, more broadly, to our conception of form in the early fifteenth century?
David A. Watt