Genre Bending in Lawman's Brut
Sponsoring Organization(s)
International Lawman's Brut Society
Organizer Name
Kenneth J. Tiller
Organizer Affiliation
Univ. of Virginia's College at Wise
Presider Name
Elizabeth J. Bryan
Presider Affiliation
Brown Univ.
Paper Title 1
Revision and Genre: The Case of Lawman's Brut
Presenter 1 Name
John P. Brennan
Presenter 1 Affiliation
Indiana Univ.-Purdue Univ.-Fort Wayne
Paper Title 2
Reconsidering Lawman's Epic Similes
Presenter 2 Name
Kenneth J. Tiller
Paper Title 3
Cordelia's Medicine in Lawman's Brut: Regimens of Health
Presenter 3 Name
Gail Ivy Berlin
Presenter 3 Affiliation
Indiana Univ. of Pennsylvania
Start Date
15-5-2015 10:00 AM
Session Location
Valley II Garneau Lounge
Description
Since its publication in 1847 by Sir Frederic Madden, Lawman's Brut has challenged scholars with the question of genre, as various studies have tried to categorize it as a “chronicle,” “epic,” “romance” or as some other form of literature. Recent studies have also noted Lawman’s blending of the features of different poetic and prose genres. Seeking to further this debate, the papers in this session examine issues of genre in the Brut. They discuss Lawman's use of different genres and sub-genres--including the chronicle, epic, and bodily health manual--and consider new approaches to Lawman’s poetic methods. The session hopes to generate critical conversation about how Lawman’s work might best be considered generically. It may, finally, ask whether it is possible—or even necessary—to assign the Brut to a generic category.
Kenneth Tiller
University of Virginia's College at Wise
Genre Bending in Lawman's Brut
Valley II Garneau Lounge
Since its publication in 1847 by Sir Frederic Madden, Lawman's Brut has challenged scholars with the question of genre, as various studies have tried to categorize it as a “chronicle,” “epic,” “romance” or as some other form of literature. Recent studies have also noted Lawman’s blending of the features of different poetic and prose genres. Seeking to further this debate, the papers in this session examine issues of genre in the Brut. They discuss Lawman's use of different genres and sub-genres--including the chronicle, epic, and bodily health manual--and consider new approaches to Lawman’s poetic methods. The session hopes to generate critical conversation about how Lawman’s work might best be considered generically. It may, finally, ask whether it is possible—or even necessary—to assign the Brut to a generic category.
Kenneth Tiller
University of Virginia's College at Wise