The Nature of the Middle Ages: A Problem for Historians? (A Roundtable)
Sponsoring Organization(s)
Haskins Society; Medieval Institute, Western Michigan Univ.
Organizer Name
Robert F. Berkhofer, III
Organizer Affiliation
Western Michigan Univ.
Presider Name
Robert F. Berkhofer, III
Paper Title 1
The Material Turn
Presenter 1 Name
Robin Fleming
Presenter 1 Affiliation
Boston College
Paper Title 2
The Study of the Middle Ages and the Dread Word Relevance
Presenter 2 Name
Marcus Bull
Presenter 2 Affiliation
Univ. of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
Paper Title 3
Not Quite Fifty Years of Women's History at Kalamazoo
Presenter 3 Name
Ruth Mazo Karras
Presenter 3 Affiliation
Univ. of Minnesota-Twin Cities
Paper Title 4
Changing Subjects in Medieval History
Presenter 4 Name
Paul Freedman
Presenter 4 Affiliation
Yale Univ.
Paper Title 5
"Medieval" People: Psyche?/Self?/Emotions?
Presenter 5 Name
Nancy Partner
Presenter 5 Affiliation
McGill Univ.
Start Date
15-5-2015 10:00 AM
Session Location
Bernhard Brown & Gold Room
Description
Session considers core questions relating to the discipline of medieval history. This includes “what's happening in medieval history now” but really aims for: what are the questions that define the entire field? Is it really defensible to try to place 1000 years under one rubric? What were (or are) the important historiographic trends (such as materiality, gender, alterity, globalism, identity)? What was the relevance of medieval historians (as opposed to medieval people)? Another topic will be the relationship of Medieval History to Medieval Studies, especially as the Congress has been such a powerful stimulus to the development of Medieval Studies in North America and internationally.
Robert F. Berkhofer III
The Nature of the Middle Ages: A Problem for Historians? (A Roundtable)
Bernhard Brown & Gold Room
Session considers core questions relating to the discipline of medieval history. This includes “what's happening in medieval history now” but really aims for: what are the questions that define the entire field? Is it really defensible to try to place 1000 years under one rubric? What were (or are) the important historiographic trends (such as materiality, gender, alterity, globalism, identity)? What was the relevance of medieval historians (as opposed to medieval people)? Another topic will be the relationship of Medieval History to Medieval Studies, especially as the Congress has been such a powerful stimulus to the development of Medieval Studies in North America and internationally.
Robert F. Berkhofer III