Homonationalisms (A Roundtable)
Sponsoring Organization(s)
Society for the Study of Homosexuality in the Middle Ages (SSHMA)
Organizer Name
Michelle M. Sauer
Organizer Affiliation
Univ. of North Dakota
Presider Name
Graham N. Drake
Presider Affiliation
SUNY-Geneseo
Paper Title 1
Homonationalisms: Now
Presenter 1 Name
Dorothy Kim
Presenter 1 Affiliation
Vassar College
Paper Title 2
Homonationalisms: Then
Presenter 2 Name
Michelle M. Sauer
Paper Title 3
Homonationalisms: Future
Presenter 3 Name
Will Youngman
Presenter 3 Affiliation
Case Western Reserve Univ.
Paper Title 4
Homonationalisms: And Beyond
Presenter 4 Name
Natalie Grinnell
Presenter 4 Affiliation
Wofford College
Start Date
16-5-2015 1:30 PM
Session Location
Valley I Hadley 101
Description
“Homonationalism” is a conceptual frame for understanding the complexities of how “acceptance” and “tolerance” for gay/lesbian subjects has become a conduit for evaluating national sovereignty. This roundtable discussion will explore if, how, and why such a concept can apply to the Middle Ages and to medievalists employing queer theory. Especially significant is the discourse of exceptionalism, which often plays a vital role in nation-state formation, set against how sexuality has become a crucial in constructing “citizens” across gender, class, and race (nationally and transnationally). Does homonationalism support imperialist structures? How does our own complicity in homonationalism affect the way we view the Middle Ages? Can/should we construct secular queer politics for the Middle Ages? And is homonationalism an analytic tool for apprehending state formation, or simply another way of distinguishing “good queers” from “bad queers” in medieval contexts?
Michelle M. Sauer
Homonationalisms (A Roundtable)
Valley I Hadley 101
“Homonationalism” is a conceptual frame for understanding the complexities of how “acceptance” and “tolerance” for gay/lesbian subjects has become a conduit for evaluating national sovereignty. This roundtable discussion will explore if, how, and why such a concept can apply to the Middle Ages and to medievalists employing queer theory. Especially significant is the discourse of exceptionalism, which often plays a vital role in nation-state formation, set against how sexuality has become a crucial in constructing “citizens” across gender, class, and race (nationally and transnationally). Does homonationalism support imperialist structures? How does our own complicity in homonationalism affect the way we view the Middle Ages? Can/should we construct secular queer politics for the Middle Ages? And is homonationalism an analytic tool for apprehending state formation, or simply another way of distinguishing “good queers” from “bad queers” in medieval contexts?
Michelle M. Sauer