Petrarch in Dialogue
Sponsoring Organization(s)
Special Session
Organizer Name
Jennifer Rushworth
Organizer Affiliation
St. John's College, Univ. of Oxford
Presider Name
Alison Cornish
Presider Affiliation
Univ. of Michigan-Ann Arbor
Paper Title 1
"Quell'altro voler di ch'i' son pieno" (RVF 264. 73): Petrarch in Dialogue
Presenter 1 Name
Francesca Southerden
Presenter 1 Affiliation
Wellesley College
Paper Title 2
Grave Matters in Dante and Petrarch
Presenter 2 Name
Jennifer Rushworth
Presenter 2 Affiliation
St. John's College, Univ. of Oxford
Paper Title 3
Stoic Ideals and Petrarch's Augustinus
Presenter 3 Name
James McMenamin
Presenter 3 Affiliation
Dickinson College
Start Date
17-5-2015 8:30 AM
Session Location
Bernhard 212
Description
The purpose of this panel is to explore some of the dialogic aspects of the late medieval Italian author Francesco Petrarca. We understand dialogue as an interpretive tool in a number of different ways: first, as an explicit structural device particularly common in Petrarch’s Latin works (such as the Secretum); second, as a deliberate stance taken in relation to one’s writerly predecessors; third, as the product of identifiable if often hidden intertextual echoes and allusions. In the last two cases, Petrarch’s dialogue with Dante is of particular importance. The question of Petrarch’s dialogue with Augustine is, moreover, a common thread between the three papers, which move towards broader questions of the motivations behind and consequences of literary dialogue.
Jennifer F. Rushworth
Petrarch in Dialogue
Bernhard 212
The purpose of this panel is to explore some of the dialogic aspects of the late medieval Italian author Francesco Petrarca. We understand dialogue as an interpretive tool in a number of different ways: first, as an explicit structural device particularly common in Petrarch’s Latin works (such as the Secretum); second, as a deliberate stance taken in relation to one’s writerly predecessors; third, as the product of identifiable if often hidden intertextual echoes and allusions. In the last two cases, Petrarch’s dialogue with Dante is of particular importance. The question of Petrarch’s dialogue with Augustine is, moreover, a common thread between the three papers, which move towards broader questions of the motivations behind and consequences of literary dialogue.
Jennifer F. Rushworth