Posthuman Piers
Sponsoring Organization(s)
International Piers Plowman Society; Medieval Ecocriticisms
Organizer Name
William Rhodes
Organizer Affiliation
Univ. of Pittsburgh
Presider Name
William Rhodes
Paper Title 1
How Should a Personification Be
Presenter 1 Name
Alexis Kellner Becker
Presenter 1 Affiliation
Univ. of Chicago
Paper Title 2
Edible Characters in Piers Plowman
Presenter 2 Name
Sarah Wood, Michael Calabrese
Presenter 2 Affiliation
Univ. of Warwick, California State Univ.-Los Angeles
Paper Title 3
The Will, The Flesh, and Langland's Biopolitics
Presenter 3 Name
Matthew Brown
Presenter 3 Affiliation
Texas Woman's Univ.
Start Date
12-5-2017 3:30 PM
Session Location
Bernhard 204
Description
This panel responds to the growing influence of posthumanist theory, which challenges scholars to attend to the ways that the category of the human is formed in relation to the non-human. Various strands of posthumanist theory – from ecocriticism to actor-network theory to object-oriented approaches to animal studies – have had a significant impact on literary scholarship, especially among medievalists, perhaps because, as one of its prominent theorists once remarked, “We have never been modern.” Medieval modes of thinking about the human, of which Piers Plowman is a stunning example, have a great deal to tell contemporary posthumanisms about the long history of writing about exta-human agencies and interactions, while posthumanist theory challenges stable modernist divisions of “human” and “nature” in a way that asks us to reconsider the specific ways human and non-human relations are construed in medieval texts. William Rhodes, wmr9@pitt.edu
Posthuman Piers
Bernhard 204
This panel responds to the growing influence of posthumanist theory, which challenges scholars to attend to the ways that the category of the human is formed in relation to the non-human. Various strands of posthumanist theory – from ecocriticism to actor-network theory to object-oriented approaches to animal studies – have had a significant impact on literary scholarship, especially among medievalists, perhaps because, as one of its prominent theorists once remarked, “We have never been modern.” Medieval modes of thinking about the human, of which Piers Plowman is a stunning example, have a great deal to tell contemporary posthumanisms about the long history of writing about exta-human agencies and interactions, while posthumanist theory challenges stable modernist divisions of “human” and “nature” in a way that asks us to reconsider the specific ways human and non-human relations are construed in medieval texts. William Rhodes, wmr9@pitt.edu