The Communication of the Incommunicable: Love as a Unifying Order in Medieval Theology and Poetry
Sponsoring Organization(s)
Special Session
Organizer Name
Erik van Versendaal
Organizer Affiliation
Pontifical John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family
Presider Name
Dabney Park
Presider Affiliation
Univ. of Miami
Paper Title 1
Communicating the Incommunicable: The Paradox of Personhood and Communion in Richard of Saint-Victor
Presenter 1 Name
Michael Camacho
Presenter 1 Affiliation
Pontifical John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family
Paper Title 2
Can the Father Give Everything without Giving Fatherhood? Relation, Incommunicability, and Self-Giving in Aquinas's Trinitarian Theology
Presenter 2 Name
Michael Joseph Higgins
Presenter 2 Affiliation
Pontifical John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family
Paper Title 3
Revelatory Embrace: Perfection as Communication in Dante's Paradiso
Presenter 3 Name
Erik van Versendaal
Start Date
13-5-2018 8:30 AM
Session Location
Schneider 1275
Description
This panel approaches the concrete structure of love as articulated in medieval Christian thought, represented here by Richard of St. Victor, Thomas Aquinas, and Dante Alighieri. Each of the three papers that will comprise this session concerns the paradoxical interplay of total communicatio and irreducible incommunicability in the perfection of personal love. Does the union at which love aims threaten the abiding mystery of the person, or vindicate it? Can we think of a union that is not totalizing – i.e., one in which distinction is perfected in relation?
Erik van Versendaal
The Communication of the Incommunicable: Love as a Unifying Order in Medieval Theology and Poetry
Schneider 1275
This panel approaches the concrete structure of love as articulated in medieval Christian thought, represented here by Richard of St. Victor, Thomas Aquinas, and Dante Alighieri. Each of the three papers that will comprise this session concerns the paradoxical interplay of total communicatio and irreducible incommunicability in the perfection of personal love. Does the union at which love aims threaten the abiding mystery of the person, or vindicate it? Can we think of a union that is not totalizing – i.e., one in which distinction is perfected in relation?
Erik van Versendaal