Discourse Features of Anchoritic Texts
Sponsoring Organization(s)
International Anchoritic Society
Organizer Name
Michelle M. Sauer
Organizer Affiliation
Univ. of North Dakota
Presider Name
Susannah Chewning
Presider Affiliation
Union County College
Paper Title 1
Carefully Choosing Words: Translation, Vocabulary, and Meaning in Middle English Anchoritic Texts
Presenter 1 Name
Jennifer N. Brown
Presenter 1 Affiliation
Marymount Manhattan College
Paper Title 2
Who Wants to Be Hugged? Discourse Features and Cognitive Processing of An Orison to God Almighty
Presenter 2 Name
Margaret Hostetler
Presenter 2 Affiliation
Univ. of Wisconsin-Oshkosh
Paper Title 3
"Thais, Alone in the Darkness": Devotional Agency and Anchoritic Audiences in Marbod's Life of Thais
Presenter 3 Name
Alicia Smith
Presenter 3 Affiliation
Queen’s College, Univ. of Oxford
Paper Title 4
Devilish Play: Codeswitching and Style Shifting in the Ancrene Wisse
Presenter 4 Name
Donna Alfano Bussell
Presenter 4 Affiliation
Univ. of Illinois-Springfield
Start Date
10-5-2019 10:00 AM
Session Location
Fetzer 1060
Description
Given the turn to sociolinguistic approaches to history of the English language and historical pragmatics approaches to medieval texts, a panel focusing on how specific language issues affect reading and understanding the anchoritic texts could be quite successful. Any topics dealing with the connection between specific language features and the social or pragmatic context of the texts would be welcome—for example, the use of discourse markers, lexicalization or grammaticalization, pronoun usage, narratological issues and stance taking, interpellation/positioning of readers, etc. Michelle M. Sauer
Discourse Features of Anchoritic Texts
Fetzer 1060
Given the turn to sociolinguistic approaches to history of the English language and historical pragmatics approaches to medieval texts, a panel focusing on how specific language issues affect reading and understanding the anchoritic texts could be quite successful. Any topics dealing with the connection between specific language features and the social or pragmatic context of the texts would be welcome—for example, the use of discourse markers, lexicalization or grammaticalization, pronoun usage, narratological issues and stance taking, interpellation/positioning of readers, etc. Michelle M. Sauer