Is Medieval Studies Secular? Thinking with Post-Secular Critique (A Roundtable)
Sponsoring Organization(s)
BABEL Working Group
Organizer Name
Julie Orlemanski
Organizer Affiliation
Univ. of Chicago
Presider Name
Suzanne Conklin Akbari
Presider Affiliation
Univ. of Toronto
Paper Title 1
Why Ask This Question?
Presenter 1 Name
Julie Orlemanski
Paper Title 2
Flowers for Mary and a Kiss for Christ: Notes on Devout Museum Visitors
Presenter 2 Name
Shirin A. Fozi
Presenter 2 Affiliation
Univ. of Pittsburgh
Paper Title 3
Litigating the "Islamic" in Anti-Terrorism Prosecutions: Medievalisms and the Problem of "Prejudice"
Presenter 3 Name
Anver M. Emon
Presenter 3 Affiliation
Univ. of Toronto
Paper Title 4
We Are Not Secular and Could Not Be, Much as We Must Try to Be!
Presenter 4 Name
James Simpson
Presenter 4 Affiliation
Harvard Univ.
Paper Title 5
Scholasticism as Secular Critique
Presenter 5 Name
Matthew Vanderpoel
Presenter 5 Affiliation
Univ. of Chicago
Paper Title 6
Secularizing Islam: Medieval History and the Production of Islam as an Ethnoreligious Identity
Presenter 6 Name
Ahmed Ragab
Presenter 6 Affiliation
Harvard Univ.
Start Date
11-5-2019 1:30 PM
Session Location
Fetzer 1005
Description
This roundtable reflects on the history and workings of medieval studies in light of “post-secular critique,” a field of social theory and analysis that, for the last fifteen years, has been critically reexamining narratives of secularization and disenchantment. Viewed through the lens of post-secular critique, the configuration of religion, rationality, and modernity turns out to be much less self-evident than it once seemed. By asking “Is medieval studies secular?” we invite reflections of what secularity is, how it can be tracked historically and institutionally, and how secularism affects various religions and religious practices differently. Julie Orlemanski
Is Medieval Studies Secular? Thinking with Post-Secular Critique (A Roundtable)
Fetzer 1005
This roundtable reflects on the history and workings of medieval studies in light of “post-secular critique,” a field of social theory and analysis that, for the last fifteen years, has been critically reexamining narratives of secularization and disenchantment. Viewed through the lens of post-secular critique, the configuration of religion, rationality, and modernity turns out to be much less self-evident than it once seemed. By asking “Is medieval studies secular?” we invite reflections of what secularity is, how it can be tracked historically and institutionally, and how secularism affects various religions and religious practices differently. Julie Orlemanski