Gower's Dark Materials
Sponsoring Organization(s)
John Gower Society
Organizer Name
Brian Gastle
Organizer Affiliation
Western Carolina Univ.
Presider Name
Roger A. Ladd
Presider Affiliation
Univ. of North Carolina-Pembroke
Paper Title 1
Dark Money: Gower and "Blinde Avarice"
Presenter 1 Name
Craig E. Bertolet
Presenter 1 Affiliation
Auburn Univ.
Paper Title 2
Gower, Translation, and the Force of a Word
Presenter 2 Name
Charles Wuest
Presenter 2 Affiliation
Averett Univ.
Paper Title 3
Standing in the Dark: Sloth and Stability, Paralysis and Perseverance in Book IV of the Confessio amantis
Presenter 3 Name
Andrea Schutz
Presenter 3 Affiliation
St. Thomas Univ.
Paper Title 4
Gower's Dark Lady
Presenter 4 Name
Matthew W. Irvin
Presenter 4 Affiliation
Univ. of the South
Start Date
10-5-2018 1:30 PM
Session Location
Schneider 1135
Description
Gower’s Dark Materials
Over six hundred years ago, Chaucer put Troilus and Criseyde under the correction of his friend, "moral Gower." A limited (and limiting) interpretation of the adjective has proven difficult to shake, despite possible conflicting elements a thoughtful study of his works might reveal. This session seeks to broaden that interrogation into multivalent concepts of darkness. Papers are solicited that engage with and/or address one or more aspects of “darkness” in Gower’s works: color, race, horror, blindness (Gower’s or others’), or the medieval sin of accidia; equally, they could engage with the way light (reason, virtue, good love) struggle with the dark forces in the human experience (folly, vice/sin, fol delit). Considerations of broad topics, e.g., the "darker" aspects of medieval orientalism, emotion theory, disability studies, material culture, and sensory theory, as informative about Gower's poetry, are equally welcome.
Brian Gastle
Gower's Dark Materials
Schneider 1135
Gower’s Dark Materials
Over six hundred years ago, Chaucer put Troilus and Criseyde under the correction of his friend, "moral Gower." A limited (and limiting) interpretation of the adjective has proven difficult to shake, despite possible conflicting elements a thoughtful study of his works might reveal. This session seeks to broaden that interrogation into multivalent concepts of darkness. Papers are solicited that engage with and/or address one or more aspects of “darkness” in Gower’s works: color, race, horror, blindness (Gower’s or others’), or the medieval sin of accidia; equally, they could engage with the way light (reason, virtue, good love) struggle with the dark forces in the human experience (folly, vice/sin, fol delit). Considerations of broad topics, e.g., the "darker" aspects of medieval orientalism, emotion theory, disability studies, material culture, and sensory theory, as informative about Gower's poetry, are equally welcome.
Brian Gastle