ScholarWorks > HHS > OT > OJOT > Vol. 12 > Iss. 2 (2024)
Credentials Display
Mørk, Gry: MSc, OT; Johnson, Susanne G.: MSc, OT; Gramstad, Astrid: PhD, OT; Stigen, Linda: PhD, OT; Carstensen, Tove: MSc, OT; Bonsaksen, Tore: MSc, OT
Abstract
There is increasing attention toward students’ satisfaction and how they perceive the quality of the program they attend. This study examined stability and change across time with regard to the relationships between learning environment factors and occupational therapy students’ satisfaction with the program. In the two consecutive cross-sectional analyses performed in this study, 163 second-year students and 193 third-year students from all six occupational therapy education programs in Norway participated. The Course Experience Questionnaire was used to assess learning environment factors and study satisfaction. The data were analyzed with Pearson’s correlation coefficient r and with hierarchical linear regression. Bivariate associations between the learning environment scales were positive and most associations were statistically significant in both study years. Relatively stable associations between the learning environment variable “good teaching” and higher study satisfaction were detected, while other associations differed between years of study. Embedding quality into the learning process, in particular by emphasizing good teaching and the clear dissemination of goals and standards, is important for student satisfaction throughout years of study.
Recommended Citation
Mørk, G., Johnson, S. G., Gramstad, A., Stigen, L., Carstensen, T., & Bonsaksen, T. (2024). Associations Between Learning Environment and Study Satisfaction Across Time: Two Cross-Sectional Analyses of Occupational Therapy Students. The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy, 12(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.15453/2168-6408.2214
Included in
Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, Higher Education Commons, Occupational Therapy Commons
Comments
The authors declare that they have no competing financial, professional, or personal interest that might have influenced the performance or presentation of the work described in this manuscript.